Current Events

GMO Labeling Law Defeated…The Debate Continues

Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, are one of the largest controversies in the modern food world. Genetically engineered organisms are organisms whose genes have been replaced with another organism’s genes. This can result in a crop that is disease resistant, drought resistant, weed resistant, insect resistant, and many other combinations, each of which make agriculture more successful in harsh conditions. These scientific breakthroughs can enable some countries with difficult climates to provide food to their populations on a more consistent basis. Despite these positive attributes, genetically modified organisms also have many detrimental effects to the body.

In the United States, it is now illegal to test genetically engineered organisms on humans, yet Americans are eating them every day. The one test done on humans resulted in allergic reactions, foreign DNA altering human DNA, intestinal reactions, and skin reactions. Since testing genetically modified organisms on humans is illegal, scientists have been experimenting with animals. They have discovered numerous adverse effects, including liver problems, damage to DNA function, accumulation of toxic substances in the liver and kidneys, infertility, damage to every organ, and issues with blood cell formation. There have been findings of tumors in rats due to diets of genetically engineered food.

Consumers have been battling for their right to know what is in their food for many years, but until now, their cry has seemingly been ignored. On November 6, 2012, citizens of California have the opportunity, according to the power of referendum, to vote for the labeling of genetically modified organisms with Proposition 37. If the proposition is a success, it will be the first time in American history that genetically modified organisms will be required to be labeled by law. Past attempts, such as in the state of Vermont and in the Senate, have been futile because big business “contributes” to political campaigns, and spends millions to convince the public that genetically engineered organisms cause no harm. However, if they are beneficial to a person’s health, why not put it on the label?

It is unjust to deprive Americans of their right to know what is in their food, and be able to make an educated choice. Yet, without labeling genetically modified organisms, people have no power to make the choice. A common misconception is that consumers are asking the government to ban genetically engineered products in Proposition 37, but they are simply requesting the accurate labeling of ingredients, so they can make the choice of whether or not to eat food containing genetically modified organisms. Not labeling genetically modified organisms goes against the original intent of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, which first required the ingredients in all food products to be clearly stated on their packaging.

Unfortunately, on November 6, 2012, the big food corporations won yet another battle in the war of labeling; when Proposition 37 was defeated. Despite this victory, we, the people, need to keep on fighting. We deserve the right to know what is in our food, and we cannot back down. Spreading awareness is the first step.

Works Cited
“50 Harmful Effects of GMO.” Genetically Modified (GM) Food, Genetically Modified Organisms, Genetic Engineering, GM Food Crops, Engineered GMOs, Genetically Altered Foods. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 Nov. 2012. .
Hirschler, Ben, and Kate Kell. “Study Finds Tumors in Rats Fed on Monsanto’s GM Corn.” Msnbc.com. Msnbc Digital Network, 19 Sept. 2012. Web. 07 Nov. 2012. .

3 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by: Wordpress
Skip to toolbar